As any real content of resistance is bled out of these counter summits they increasingly become indistinguishable from outdoor markets or shopping malls. Here is an extract from an email from ’somebodies’ encouraging a ‘really really free market’ as an act of resistance, during the G20.
“Basically, somebodies create a space in a public setting, put out the word, and people bring stuff and/or take stuff. Whilst it could just be seen as a swap meet, the Really, Really Free Market movement has its roots in a really different way of seeing social and economic relations.”
…
“The Really, Really Free Market movement aims to counteract capitalism in a non-reactionary way. It holds as a major goal, to build a community based on sharing resources, caring for one another and improving
the collective lives of all.”
By ‘non-reactionary’ I suspect this person refers to the idea that people shouldn’t say things like ‘everything is fucked lets destroy it’ – instead people should propose alternatives. One thing I have never heard explained from these people is just why all their ‘non-reactionary’ activities are expansions of capital – always creation of commodities to hold onto as ‘an answer, or a multitude of answers’. Why is it so hard to conceive of escape from capital being a world without the commodity – why is there this clinginess to commodities from people that find this work-capital-commodity society so inhumane.
…
And then the statement – ‘the really, really free market movement has its roots in a really different way seeing social and economic relations’ was it a bewildering joke or some attempt to mystify people into thinking that the organisers of this spectacle were ‘outside or capital’ and like Gabriel had informed humanity of the escape from their alienation – a swap meet.
Along with this project this summit, as with others, has attracted ‘affinity groups’ whose primary purpose seems to be gaining access to an elusive niche market - the anit-capitalist - so as to be able to carry out their ‘anti-capitalist activities’. One such group is a t-shirt cooperative that have gone one step further then the people of the LIP factory* in the self-management of their own oppression - they have decided to set up their own factory and industry. They have decided that the best action to support an anti-capitalism movement is to set up a t-shirt co-operative, make really really radical t-shirts with really really radical slogans. And of course what makes this co-operative so radically radical is that they use concensus decision making to enforce their own oppression – that’s so much more radical-er than anything ever! This group plans to use the G20 summit as the perfect opportunity to attract business from their niche market…
In light of this we must ask – what do we do about these really really capo-scumbags? Our first thought would, logically, be to round up some people to rob them blind (in an effort to ‘improve the collective lives of us all’), unfortunately this is only likely to leave those in the new factories with renewed motivation to sacrifice in the pursuit of production. A second thought might be to just forget it and leave them to suffer in their silly efforts – just as one would leave any sales person struggling to construct a market (this is of course the likely outcome – but only as a result of laziness – not commited thought). The third option would be to ridicule them in an effort to lift the mystification that prevents them seeing the reality of their flagellation. Perhaps simple things like covering the area in which they are selling/spruiking, or whatever, with stencils proclaiming such things as ‘YOU ARE THE CAPITALISTS’.
*The LIP factory is a factory that went backrupt and was taken over by its workers in order to avoid unemployment. They self-managed the factory and their own oppression in order to produce watches. Down the track they hired casuals to help out – they wern’t included in the ‘self-management’. This t-shirt project seems to be the same except that they are setting up the jobs in the first place.

Wow you guys are just too cool. I mean, I thought stop g20 were all anti-authoritarian and rebellious, but clearly if I want to be the coolest kid at Uni, I’m going to have to oppose even them! Just like you COOL people. Just when people think they have caught up to my coolness, I’ll show them. “Global Justice is sooooo 1999″ I’ll say. And thus my reputation as the most mysterious cat in town will grow even further. Because that’s what politics is all about!Hell you guys are so cool and exclusive, you don’t even have any replies to your blogs yet. Well i’ll be the first. Of coarse, when others catch on, I’ll disappear, and form stopstopstopg20.
Comment by SGF — October 30, 2006 @ 8:29 pm
Your picture of a world free from the dull trappings of “commodities”, of consumerism, nay, of productionism: it’s beautiful, a void free from all those inconvenient objects left over from the old world, free from the inherent evils of production. A world comprised of the pure manifestation of all working-class desires, forever consummating themselves in an eternal orgasm of metaphysical hyper-revolution! Your theoretical proposal of “destruction of everything” is, of course, the only viable method of achieving emancipation for the working-class, and should be taken up immediately by real activists everywhere. If we start today, well, I anticipate we’ll be so successful that by the time G20 comes about there’ll be nothing left to get upset about!
With regards to the proposal of alternatives and all this talk of actually attempting to execute them: I knew these leftists were stupid, but their actual contemplation of such outlandish fancies still manages to surprise me. With the aid of your well researched exposé, I can now see the truth: these fuckers are so ingrained in the capitalist system, they’ve even resorted to proposing alternatives to capitalism as part of their overarching crypto-capitalist scheme. They’ve never even had the balls to explain “why all their ‘non-reactionary’ activities are expansions of capital”, they had to be secretive about it, radiating their dark forces of exploitation through the aether: verily, the invisible hand of the gift economy. Fortunately, we haven’t yet felt the effects of the invisible fist! I’m glad the working-class have your adroit arguments to counteract the Gabriel-esque maniacs, else those reality-obsessed bastards may have actually been able to convince people to freely exchange items… no… commodities!
Comment by Max von Stakhanov — November 2, 2006 @ 11:13 am
I like to talk about stool.
Comment by Fecal McStool — November 19, 2006 @ 8:28 am